• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Communism doesn’t require “constant universal altruism,” the goal is a collectively owned and planned world Socialist Republic, kinda like Star Trek. There’s criticism that differences between communes in Anarchism could lead to a resurgance of competition, trade, and Capitalism eventually (which I’ll let Anarchists respond to, not me), but Communism in the Marxian understanding is the opposite of Utopian.

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Star Trek isn’t a realistic model, though. I understand the goal you’re describing, but what’s the motivation that gets enough of the population to play along?

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Star Trek is just to get an image in your head. Motivation is similar for other modes of production, labor for goods and services. At a lower stage, Communism would likely have systems like labor vouchers to credit an hour of labor, with more for more intense or skilled labor. At a higher phase with sufficient automation, this becomes less necessary to keep production going.

        • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I see your point on altruism, it seems a much larger problem with large-scale anarchism. I think my primary issue with what you’re describing is that I hold a dim view of planned economies. Thanks for explaining.