• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Too bad Putin has nothing to say about that unless he pulls his troops out of the sovereign nation of Ukraine.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      And even then.

      Mr Putin current has a say on whether this own country has nukes. Through his veto power in the UNSC he can meddle to some extent in other countries.

      I think this is one case where he really needs to understand how uninvolved and powerless he is.

      Can’t he do something positive in his remaining years?

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The title and teaser really don’t make the article justice.

    The title and teaser is promoting Putins propaganda.

    The article later does give context both to what Zelensky said and the history of Ukraine denuclearization and failed security guarantees.

    I still hate the whole layout. First and foremost, it fearmongers or baits.

    I would have liked a title that summarizes the article, or puts Putins claims into context. Not publishing Russian propaganda.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I get what you mean but I used this piece specifically because western media started to downplay Zalensky’s threat of developing nuclear arms as misunderstanding. Putin seem to think it is credible. And I hope it is.

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Putin saying something doesn’t tell you anything about what he believes.

        He took the opportunity to paint Ukraine in a dangerous light, and put out a threat of escalation as well, while also painting Russia in a powerful and rightful way.

        although Zelenskiy later clarified that neither a nuclear program “nor anything like that” is part of his plans

        They’re repeating Russian talking points to a non-thing.

        • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I wouldn’t take any of those things at face value. Even a veiled threat that was later downplayed could have been made just so that the other side starts considering it more seriously.

  • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Well russia broke Budapester Memorandum long ago ( well the West too with this low help ). So yea Ukraine should do it

    “The Russian army is becoming not only one of the most technologically advanced” lol which technology? Drones ammunition trucks etc mostly from other countries

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Could the circumstances be honoring the agreement you made in 2014 on this exact fucking topic?

    This little russian fuckwit is growing senile.

      • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Ideally no country would have nuclear weapons, but I don’t think Russia’s call for denuclearisation should be taken with any seriousness whatsoever unless they get rid of their own nukes.

  • Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The whole world demonstrated it clearly. If it’s not in a big alliance, it needs nukes or the world will fuck the country over.

    Nice precedent set there by pacivity, or outright aggression. Good job nuclear powers, real nice (/s).

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If the west wants to prevent nuclear proliferation they have to defend a county that gave up nukes willingly for the promise of defense. Shortsightedness of the western powers will lead to more countries learning from Ukraine’s mistake and hurt us worse than whining of a despot could ever do. It’s not like that big alliance doesn’t have nukes either.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        they have to defend a county that gave up nukes willingly for the promise of defense

        I agree with you, but the problem here lies with the fact that the promise was made by the same fucking country doing the invasion (Russia).

        So no promise was made by the West or NATO in any way to Ukraine. Get your facts straight.

      • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I feel like the West is just doing the bare minimum to support Ukraine. Enough to be able to say “look we did something” but not too much, because maybe some voters won’t understand the benefits of spending their taxes on Ukraine.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “Big alliance” part is also untested. Who knows what would happen if Putin got Ukraine fast and moved onto the Baltics.

  • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Remember when Russia signed that contract to not attack it’s ex colonies if they give up their nukes?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

    According to the three memoranda,[6] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively removing all Soviet nuclear weapons from their soil, and that they agreed to the following:

    Respect the signatory’s independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).[7]

    Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

    Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.

    Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they “should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used”.

    Not to use nuclear weapons against any non - nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.[8][9][10]

    Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.[11][12]

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      Has anyone mentioned, just in passing, that if Putin withdrew there would be no motivation for the Ukrainians to even continue fighting. Well, except for revenge.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Blyat showed his hand the moment he invaded a non-nuclear state. Ukraine would be fucking dumb af not to develop nukes.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s funny though, the only countries that don’t get invaded now are the ones with nuclear weapons. 🤷‍♂️