• FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    melon-musk “Which is why I’ve made it my mission, at great personal cost, to suppress better arguments!”

    Also, nothing but love for Carl Sagan. I want to live in the world he believed in. But! Sometimes the best cure for a fallacious argument is a picture of a pig with poop on its balls

  • HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s not true, not even in science. Science has strong gatekeeping and moderation in the form of peer review. You can’t just publish any old shite.

    And we’ve seen what happens to online spaces when you get rid of gatekeeping and moderation. You get 8chan. You get the Christchurch shooting.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s not true, not even in science. Science has strong gatekeeping and moderation in the form of peer review. You can’t just publish any old shite.

      That, in large part, is why I have a particular dislike of self-described “autodidact” grifters that tend to run rampant in Silicon Valley circles, getting subsidized by the ultra-rich because they are bullshit artists and sometimes outright cult leaders (see “MIRI” for example), promising miracles and transcendence to the ultra-rich where peer-reviewed scientific inquiry won’t.