Former president tells Glenn Beck he would have ‘no choice’ but to lock up opponents ‘because they’re doing it to us’

  • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    363
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have Project 2025 out there literally announcing the end of democracy should a republican president be voted in. Their plan is to enact Schedule F which allows the prez to kick people from the senate and place his own chosen people there and to allow the prez to essentially take over the whole executive branch of the government.

    LIKE GODDAMMIT, THERE’S A DICTATORSHIP UNDER CONSTRUCTION! WHY ISN’T THIS EVEN NEWSWORTHY? WHY DOES THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA SOLELY FOCUS ON THE CLIMATE ASPECT ON PROJECT 2025? IT’S LITERALLY THE PLAN TO END DEMOCRACY! AND OF COURSE LGBTQIA+ PEOPLE!

    • Yoryo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      130
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thought you were joking but it’s holy shit it’s real. The heritage foundation even has an article about it.

        • eric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          55
          ·
          1 year ago

          Holy shit. Reality is so crazy lately that it seems more and more made up every year.

        • MTLion3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s fucking clinical, honestly. Like, how are even Republicans down for this shit?

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            1 year ago

            For the last 20 years Fox News and conservative media have been demonizing Democrats as anti-American and disloyal and trying to actively intentionally destroy America. They also are given this propaganda that they’re the real Americans and the only thing left to save the world, so that mindset gives them permission to end democracy to save their way of life.

            • MTLion3@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              Delusional. And then I know some of them have just always been republican so they keep voting that way regardless. Like, damn, wake up to the bullshit around you. This isn’t a matter of differing ideologies anymore - this is a matter of fighting for keeping the right to vote about those differing ideologies.

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hello viewers, before we sign off I’d like to remind you that you are the superior human even though you are oppressed and can’t get anything you deserve, and that those other people are idiotic soft weaklings just preparing to take over and destroy us all!

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How can the Republican Party infiltrate itself. They’re already members of them self. Therefore they cannot infiltrate themselves because they’re already part of themselves.

              The tea party was complete AstroTurf from the start. Run by well-known Republicans for republicans.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude/dudette, I just want to say thank you for making us aware of this. It’s batshit, and it absolutely does need to be blasted on all channels.

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mainstream media wants it to happen and is owned by the very people who designed it.

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As bad as Project 2025 looks I couldn’t see anything about kicking out senators, “just” federal employees.
      Any sources on the more extreme claims?

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You kick out the federalist that do things like, investigate overturning elections, and suddenly the midterms are all republican wins.

        From there, you have someone who can get power passed to change things like presidential term limits. Now you have a king or an emperor with a bunch of yes men backing him up in decisions. Eventually, they can institute whatever policies they want and force states, by force, to enact what they want with military power and courts who rule in their favor.

        Oh, but there are people in the military who will stand up and do what’s right? Well, they will be branded as wackos and enemies of the state who are speaking ill of the totally “legit” election. So they are put in front of a firing squad and all that’s left are those who already believe in Der Fuhrer.

        It’s a complete shit show in the making and fucking frightening what they could do with disinformation and no checks.

      • Yoryo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re definitely right. I spent a good minute going through the guide but the most nefarious stuff was gaining complete control of the executive branch. This guide is like a first step for a first term. Well brb guys, going to figure how to take over the government with only the executive branch.

        • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is the army part of the executive? If yes, then… idk, build a shelter, leave, arm yourself or just accept your new overlords.

          Theoretically a president could call the army to throw out dissidents. In practice… i think the army is right-leaning but i don’t think that they would simply follow through. It depends.

          • Yoryo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Per section 4 DOD I should be getting some brownie point by providing more goodies to each branch even the space force. I would also be making adjustments to the culture to make sure there’s no woke people. Personal army wise I think my best bet will be to use ice since they fall under Homeland security. There was a note somewhere about removing the restrictions of where they can operate.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t lie or spread misinformation. The language says they would find ways to BYPASS the senate in some circumstances. Still terrible but disinformation will cause people to not believe the legitimate warnings.

      • Yoryo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are correct. Page 168 has the “An Aggressive Approach to Senate-Confirmed Leadership Positions” section, laying out how to bypass senate confirmed positions. Still nothing about kicking members of Congress.

    • xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That book they’re selling is like a modern “Mein Kampf.” It’s very interesting because I know quite a few moderate conservatives who wouldn’t ever support the policy proposed in this book, but they are still going to vote red because they believe it will fix the economy.

  • Hyggyldy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I was wondering if the actual quote was something more weaselly than that but nope.

    Beck: “If you become president will you lock people up?”

    Trump: “The answer is you have no choice, because they’re doing it to us.”

  • Rusticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well he campaigned on “lock her up” and despite nearly a dozen investigations and her testifying in front of Congress for 10 hours, guess what happened? Zippity doo daa

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guarantee the person you’re responding wants nothing less than to become educated on this topic.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, 39 times, yet no evidence was found of wrongdoing other than business as usual when sensitive into was involved iirc. I’ve never liked her but you gotta give it to her that she’s not exactly the evil that people made her out to be, and in contrast to the rest of these terrible fuckers running the country to the ground

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re thinking of Reagan testifying before Congress about Iran Contra.

        It worked for Karl Rove and Dick Cheney when they talked about vote manipulation in 2004.

        It was also the only way Spiro Agnew got through his corruption hearing in front of Congress while Nixon tried to do the same for Watergate until the taped conversations were released.

        It’s a time tested conservative play when confronted by a request to tell the truth: don’t lie but deny the allegations. Weirdly, I can’t find any time a democrat, Hilary or otherwise, repeated “I don’t recall” for their entire testimony. It just seems to be a conservative play.

      • Rusticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is exactly how she beat those 91 felony indictments, right? Oh wait, it’s TRUMP that’s going to prison. Maybe Hillary will bring him some cookies in the slammer when he becomes someone’s butt buddy.

  • KaiReeve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    His entire campaign in 2016 was ‘locking up’ Hillary. If he wasn’t able to accomplish that in 4 years, what makes him think he can follow through with this promise now that he has numerous enemies on both sides of the aisle?

    Nothing short of a full-blown Shutzstaffel will fulfill even a fraction of his current campaign promises.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      Playing devil’s advocate, the Trump team didn’t expect to win and quite frankly had no clue how to pull the levers of power for a large portion of his presidency. If, God forbid, he is reelected that will not be the case. They will know how to play the system much more effectively than they did last time.

      • atticus88th@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that happens then my grandchildren will be living in nearly the identical series events my grandmother escaped from.

        We have learned nothing from our past mistakes.

      • Djinger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Furthermore, they’ve been bleating about the left doing exactly what he’s saying despite it not being the case, so his followers and acolyte will 100% back him when he does it for real. Another Big Lie

      • n0m4n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They learned some of what didn’t work. That does not translate to being able to any better ability to lead a nation. Authoritarians always fail on the fatal flaw of believing their own BS, and sycophants reaffirming that delusion. Kings, Popes, Hitler, Putin, Dear Leader, and now Xi all were inflicted with that delusion.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haven’t most abandoned him and bad mouthed him. It will be new incompetents and deplorables. Some will be the same, but they are the background people.

        I wonder if seeing the problems some allies now have seeking alternative employment or opportunities will give them pause. Then I remember they are not great critical thinkers.

        The more moderate Republicans stayed away and rightly so. I don’t think they will be tempted to rejoin. Luckily, he’s got much less chance. His base is shrinking, albeit at a much slower rate than it should. People are more aware of what a terrible person and president he will be. Those paying attentiyalready knew.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s never believed that he’d be able to lock up anyone other than PoC and migrants. His base bought into it. I don’t thing this promise is going to hold nearly the same support as last time. Sure, they’ll still love him to death and try to elect him but I don’t expect that they’ll be so sure that he’ll make this happen. But it’s a re-run and americans are famous for watching garbage television, so who knows.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honest question, but how is Trump still alive? He’s in his late seventies, apparently eats McDonalds most days with an ungodly amount of diet coke, and looks like he hasn’t exercised since the 80’s.

      He’ll be in his 80’s if he gets another term, and given his lifestyle, the stresses of business/politics, and the constant travel, I simply cannot see him continuing. I know Biden is 80, but at least he looks like he’s looked at a vegetable or had a brisk walk this year…

      • danielton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These geriatrics need to fucking retire. Gen X basically got shut out of federal politics, and the best-known millennial didn’t take federal office until 2019.

      • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure a bunch of them live off spite and hatred. My kindest grandparents passed away first, and the meanest one is still somehow kicking.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always said, when he dies, the right wing nutters are going to go fucking BALLiSTIC with conspiracy theories, and De Santis or whoever takes over will fan the flames and accuse Biden or Hillary or whoever the fuck of having him assassinated and shits going to melt down fast.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What else would this douchebag do, really? He had 4 years and the only thing he “accomplished” was tax breaks for the elite.

    Of course this tiny petty man will use the power of the office to exact revenge. He’s not going to do anything for Americans.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He had 4 years and the only thing he “accomplished” was tax breaks for the elite

      He also “accomplished” making intentional allies a lot less willing to trust the US.

        • Intralexical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I’m glad to see the EU and its constituent countries realize it needs to be able to assert itself without counting fully on the US.

          Granted, I don’t have to live in the US myself, so… Sorry about that.

      • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, a lot of those deaths were inevitable. Trump did not create the anti-vax movement. He just taught it to torture itself with horse dewormer to own the libs.

        • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair and accurate, he lied to the country about the seriousness of the outbreak. He’s on recording in Feb 2020 flat-out telling Bob Woodward it’s going to be bad, it’s much more deadly than the flu. At the same time he’s publicly calling it a hoax, that its going to go away, like a miracle.

          The people that trusted him didn’t take it serious because he told them not to, and then accused everyone taking it serious to be fools or intentionally trying to create a panic and steal their liberties. Had he simply allowed the scientists and the CDC to speak candidly and deferred to them, thousands upon thousands of lives would have been saved.

          • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh I don’t mean to imply he is not responsible or try to make light of his disastrous incompetence, the absolute shithead definitely got many people killed by insisting the biggest public health crisis in recent memory was no big deal. A solid quarter of the US population to this day still hangs on his every word. I’m just saying that with or without him, a good chunk of people were going to refuse to get vaccinated or practice social distancing no matter what. This undercurrent of contrarian mental illness in America is not new.

            • Wilibus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And deliberately normalizing that behavior is the issue. Same thing with racism, Trump doesn’t create or promote racism, he just normalizes the racist behavior.

              • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well that goes without saying. These people were always like this, but social norms forced them to be more quiet about it. Career conman and karma Houdini Trump comes along and shows his people that not only can they be be open and proud of their worst qualities, they can get away with their behavior in nearly all cases.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              This undercurrent of contrarian mental illness in America is not new.

              Sadly, you’re correct, this is very much not new. That’s a political flier from 1955 put out during the height of the red scare and McCarthyism. I’d say conservatives need new material, but it’s very clear that the old material is working just as well today as it was 70 years ago.

    • Greenbubbleb0y@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was looking into this. Obama added roughly 8 trillion dollars to the national debt. Trump added the same amount in half as much time.

      • No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While both of these statements are true, Obama did it to get the US out of the recession hole where the previous 8 years of unsecured mortgages and crazy walls street bets from investment banks created endemic risk and failure propagation.
        Very different outcomes of the same moneys, specially considering we even turn some profit on sellin the bailed out car companies and once they paid some of these loans.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s important to understand each of their reasoning:

        Obama added to the national debt in order to jumpstart a stalled economy that was deep, DEEEEEEP in the shitter after Bush just noped’out after letting the housing market explode and adding two wars to the bill. Paying all that shit off, PLUS, what was planned to be damned-near-universal-healthcare but became JUST a huge expansion to most people’s health benefits (the ACA).

        Those are things Obama’s admin paid for and we saw actual, tangible returns on. The economy roared back to life. Medical costs and insurance costs went down.

        What benefits did we see from Trump’s deficit ballooning tax cuts? hmm lemme look here… ah, the report says JACK SHIT.

        Unless you’re a billionaire.

        So yeah, they both added to the national debt but at least most americans received a functioning economy and a chance for healthcare from Obama. Genuinely, Thanks Obama!

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t even hiding that they are wanna-be dictators anymore.
    And “freedom” loving conservatives just cheer this on.
    They “love” America so much, they want to destroy our democracy. The level of hypocrisy amongst the Right is astonishing.

    • Hazor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of the followers can’t see past “we’re going to save America from the evil Democrats”. It’s not as if Fox News or OAN put the fascist behaviors on display. They genuinely believe Trump when he says the Democrats are persecuting him, rather than that the justice system is prosecuting him for crimes - his only “crime” was trying to save America from those evil commie Democrats, after all. They take all the BS at face value because … tribalism and fear or something?

      The only people in the Republican party who actually understand what’s happening are the rich and the powerful. Everyone else, the voters especially, are just useful idiots.

    • zer0nix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They want freedom from accountability, like King Leopold’s congo free state.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re expecting someone to actually enforce consequences on him for this you haven’t been paying attention.

        • Wilibus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m kind of worried about that being the case. Not American though, you should probably be more worried if you actually live there.

            • Wilibus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Being an outside observer I am kind of excited for him to flee the country and attempt to run for president of the United States from somewhere like Russia or North Korea.

              Best. Timeline. Ever.

                • Wilibus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Which part exactly? Him being found guilty, him trying to flee the country, or him continuing to claim victory after fleeing the country?

                  This timeline is eerily close to a conceivable reality.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they screech about the justice system being weaponized because they’re being tried and prosecuted for their crimes, and then turn around and in the same breath just flat out say they’ll weaponize the justice system. Classic case of saying the quiet part out loud.

    • escapesamsara@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most conservatives, as in all of those not in charge, have issues with empathy; specifically imagining the inner world of any other human being. That’s not to say that cannot do this very simple human activity, rather they specifically cannot imagine any other human on the planet thinks any differently or has any other motivations than them. Therefore if they would do something in a situation, then everyone in that situation must be trying to do the thing that they would do.

      They believe democrats are weaponizing the justice system, because it’s what they would do, and thus they assume anyone that failed to do that before now was simply prevented from doing so – now that they see ‘weaponized’ justice happening, they think it’s fair game for their guys to do it.

    • krakenx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you (in the general sense) don’t believe that Trump and his cronies committed crimes, then you would likely believe that the justice system is being used to attack him. If it’s being used to attack him, then him doing the same to his opponents is equivalent and fair.

      Whether or not you believe he committed crimes is dependent on your news sources, ability to fact check and think critically, and your trust in the justice system.

      A very significant portion of the population doesn’t believe he committed crimes.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They need to ask ab9ut this during these republican debate/PR events. Do you support tump’s call tto arrest his political opponents?" Yes or no,

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ummm, that’s not the question you’re hoping it is.

      They chanted “lock her up!” at rallies.

      The people who still support this man (and it’s a lot of people) would turn against anyone who answered with a no.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          The people being asked the question will not answer in good faith. They are blood thirsty, they are angry, and they want a scapegoat, not a civics lesson.

          • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            If those peo0le who are running for president are blood thirsty, we should probably know about it before voting starts.

            • escapesamsara@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              DeSantis was a lawyer for Gitmo; Trump wanted to execute five innocent black men before he had any political ambitions; Vivek fully embraces the caste system that benefited his family in the past, and has pretty openly suggested he wants to use violence to implement it here. We know the people who are running for president are blood thirsty, they don’t hide that in any way. They chose to run on a conservative platform, violence is inherent to the ideology, and on top of that frequently advertise how well they would play the role of violence if elected.

              • theangryseal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Those 5 black men he wanted executed were between 14 and 16 years old.

                He wanted to execute five black and Hispanic children. That’s what he wanted to do. Paid from his own pocket to advertise it too.

                I’m not correcting you because I disagree, I just wanted to drive that point home.

                Your comment is 100% on point aside from that little error.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I agree with all of this, but unfortunately none of it is framed this way in the media.

                The mass media kinda has a “Jews for Hitler” vibe going about it right now, because a lot of Trump’s “political enemies” are journalists. They should stop pussyfooting around that fact and stop covering this as a horse race because if he wins he’s gonna run his horse right over them first with the rest of us not too far behind.

            • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can listen to to to them talk at any recorded rally they have. There are interviews with these people. Websites. PACs. Years of history. Television debates are not the only way to know thier thoughts. None of these people appeared out of thin air.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already asked them if they would support Trump as nominee ( their political rival ) if he was arrested and imprisoned. I think 6 of 8 said “yes”.

      • Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically 5 of 8 said yes, DeSantis waited to see what everyone else did and then raised his hand as well.

          • Wilibus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hesitating isn’t the same as waiting to make sure you’re on the same team as the popular kids.

            If anything hesitating puts him marginally above these other bootlicking fascists.

    • icdmize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump doesn’t do debates anymore. He doesn’t have to. I think he has saturated his market.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t Ramaswamy basically say he would rule through executive order and ignore the courts and congress?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Once again the Right is accusing the Left of things the Right wants to do.

    Pretty sneaky trick really.

    Say your enemy is going to do something

    Do it

    Get told “Hey you’re doing X”

    Tell them “Projecting much? Everyone knows you’re the one who’s doing X, I even said so before you accused me of anything!”