A collaborative space of exploration into questions about the natural world, and meta-questions such as what constitutes an answer, a question, or why we can even ask questions in the first place. We are tortured souls, cursed with an insatiable hunger for answers and questions alike, and the knowledge that we can never know them all. Submissions should be relevant to scientific subjects somehow rooted in physics. It can get blurry sometimes, but if you can answer the question “How could this help us understand the nature of our perceived reality?” you should be ok. These are the informal guidelines we follow here: 1. The questions we pose, we believe to have falsifiable answers [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability]. 2. The answers we put forth, we believe to be falsifiable. 3. The discussions we have, we have in good faith and in the genuine interest of identifying or understanding the kind of questions and answers we believe can satisfy the above points. Submissions and comments are moderated on a subjective case-by-case basis to facilitate and maintain a healthy, cosy, and rewarding environment for you who would come here with a genuine interest in learning, participating or merely observing others engage in natural philosophy. Just to state some obvious (non-exhaustive set of) behaviours and content we won’t have here: bigotry; hate speech; sealioning [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning]; strawmen [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man]; pseudo-science; anti-science; dis-/ misinformation. Additional context may be taken into consideration as well.