• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Way too many people are absolutely appalled when I say I don’t care if some of my taxes go to keeping lazy people alive, inside, fed, and warm. I don’t care if someone is not working because they’re disabled, being educated, looking for a job, or just lazy, no one should live without basic human dignity.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I will gladly accept if my taxes go to someone lazy if it means people that need it are getting the assistance they need. It’ll happen anyways may as well help people who need it. That said I don’t condone people scamming the system but it’s either very high administration costs or people that need it don’t get it usually. I went on assistance once, needed it short term, recall some dude talking about how it was his weekend spending money. Annoying to hear but I got the assistance I needed for that short time till I got a job. Always felt my attitude would fit better in some European or Scandinavian countries but I’m older now and don’t speak anything other than English.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      FR FR, defrauding the system should be punished, not prevented, because right now preventative measures are very obviously doing jack shit in actual service to the public

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m not even talking about fraud. I think someone should still be entitled to a basic existence even if they don’t want to work. Like sure, don’t give them an Xbox Series X, but, give them food and heat. Maybe even an Xbox 360. What are those, like $30?

        • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I only find my life fulfilled if I have the latest systems, games, and full online services for each.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Minor nitpick: if it’s snowing outside (and you can do so), then wear a fucking sweater inside! Heating a whole room by a few degrees when you could just not run around with a T-shirt is just so wasteful.

    If you can’t wear one, because you’re disabled, then ignore my rant, please.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah, to be young again and not have your hands and feed start freezing indoors when it starts getting chilly outside…

    • azenyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Electricity companies hate this trick!

      For real I dont understand why people forget that they can just wear thicker clothes even at home. And they complain the electricity is expensive

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Significantly lowering indoors temperatures can have detrimental effects on health, particularly for elderly people. Also, electricity should be sufficiently accessible and cheap that I don’t need to freeze my butt off in my home in order to pay the bills.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re reading waay too much into my comment. I specifically said that there were exceptions and only said that you shouldn’t heat up to t-shirt temperatures.

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We COULD do this, if every lobbyist were disposed of and we similarly handled the billionaires. Otherwise there’s no hope here.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What does owning adequate clothing even mean?

    Here in California, I can go to a local shelter right now and get all of these things. Except adequate clothing because I don’t know what that even means.

    • evergreen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d assume adequate clothing means clothing that fits properly, and is appropriate for the climate and weather.

      Sometimes I see homeless people wearing shoes that look way to big for them and I’m guessing it’s because that was the closest they could find that fit on their feet so they just had to go with that. It’s really not adequate though because it could be a tripping hazard.