The association, founded in 1876, condemned legislation that would threaten librarians and other educators with criminal prosecution for possessing “obscene” material.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      9 months ago

      Let’s not pretend censorship is new. People who are old enough remember Tipper Gore and Frank Zappa arguing over music censorship.

    • TakiMinase@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Authoritarians want to watch us poop and have intercourse. They also want to count how many times we masturbate. That is the authoritarian sickness.

    • TakiMinase@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Authoritarians want to watch us poop and have intercourse. They also want to count how many times we masturbate. That is the authoritarian sickness.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      What happened to freedom of speech?

      Doesn’t apply to school libraries. Would you be okay with having Hustler magazines at your local library?

      Personal accountability? Basic fucking parenting?

      What kind of parenting are you referring to? Do you expect parents to hold their kids’ hands all day at school?

      • iquanyin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        i expect them to trust their kids and not try to micromanage the entire country because the don’t.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wait, so are parents supposed to have “personal responsibility” or are they supposed to “trust their kids”?

          • iquanyin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            are those mutually exclusive? i didn’t find them to be. as with every single thing, you have to be attentive and responsive to the actual kids and situation. those change as time goes on…

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t know, really. You speak in vague generalities and I don’t know what you’re actually trying to say.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I didn’t see any school do that. That’s not the point. The point is, if it were in schools, would that be considered “freedom of speech”?

          And if not, then we’ve established that “freedom of speech” does not protect pornographic content in children’s public libraries.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s relevant because the question is not about what type of books are being “banned” but whether “freedom of speech” preserves the right to stock whatever books you want in a public school library.

              • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

                There is no reason to restrict information.

                There is a reason to restrict nude pinups, as there is not an educational purpose to them, they are entertainment.

                There is no reason to restrict non-sexual depictions of nudity.

                There is no reason to restrict sexual depictions of nudity, if the depiction supports a narrative of conflict resolution, safety, or another educational purpose.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

                  In elementary schools? With children. Well that’s certainly an interesting take.

                  There is no reason to restrict information.

                  Strange, all sorts of other information is restricted from children by law…

                  There is no reason to restrict non-sexual depictions of nudity.

                  Some of these books have graphical depictions of sexual acts. I’m not sure why anyone would think that’s something important to have in a school library or programme.

  • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    More apt is that knowledge and learning is a threat to “their” particular brand of democracy. So let us hassle and hobble libraries (with the ultimate goal of shutting them down) under the pretext of “obscene material”.

  • Yewb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Hey we have this commercial library opening up you can read books by the chapter renting each chapter is really inexpensive.”

    I can see the writing on the wall.

  • el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Funny that the association was founded in 1876 when that’s the century being emulated by banning “obscene” material.