• iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I mean stop touching the damn boats. People be touching US boats like 4 times in history and it always turns out bad.

    The Imperial Japanese Navy sank 8 US boats and we dropped the Sun on them. Twice.

    • iain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The US is willing to kill untold number of people because otherwise the cheap shirts made by children in Bangladesh will arrive slightly late. I do hope for this evil empire to fucking die already.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        For Bangladesh it’s probably faster to go east to get to the US. The majority of ships going through the Suez Canal are trading with Europe.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Looked at a non paywall source, it was the US advising ships to avoid the area for the next couple days because they plan on doing more strikes and don’t want other ships caught in the crossfire

        • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          They are protecting their civilians or the ones they can benefit from, and killing others who are not, they are not doing this in good faith

        • iain@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Cargo ships can take a longer route, they don’t need to be there. The US values cargo over human lives.

          • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Cargo includes food, clothing, fuel, building materials and other necessities of life. Fucking with global trade causes inflation, which primarily affects the poorest people. Also, global trade underpins the peace and security of all 8 billion people on Earth. No one group has the right to disrupt the global system of trade over their petty local disputes. If they do, they should expect to feel the full wrath of the rest of the world. Frankly, I’m surprised that the Houthis are being handled with such a light touch so far.

            • iain@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              The whole world watches as Israel commits genocide. The Houthis are brave to try to slow down the massacre of the Palestinian people, even though they themselves have been subject to a brutal war against them by the US and Saudi Arabia. If you care about the poorest people, then hold the capitalists responsible. They raise the prices on the poor and for any made up reason. We’ve seen this in the last couple years a when they pretended that it was inflation while they hoarded more and more wealth. Let them pay the skipping delay out of their own pockets first.

              • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I do, like the vast majority of Lemmy users, hold the extremely wealthy responsible for a lot of human suffering, but this is a thread about the Houthis attacking civilian cargo ships. Both capitalists hoarding wealth and terrorists attacking cargo ships can be bad at the same time. Whatever you think of the Palestinian situation, the Houthis are currently adding to the sum total of human suffering, not subtracting from it.

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            The longer route costs an additional million dollars in diesel alone. Even if you don’t care about the enormous economic impact, the environmental impact alone is huge.

            • iain@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh okay, so we’re killing people over causing environmental damage? Let’s murder the CEO of Nestle, BP etc. They deserve it way more!

              • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                You know that isn’t what I am saying.

                As far as I’m aware, there have been no reports whatsoever of non-military targets being hit in the strikes. Targeting the infrastructure being used by a non-state group to disrupt the most critical trade route on earth is absolutely proportionate.

                The CEOs of those companies should be prosecuted instead, however there is not appropriate legislation for environmental damage in the UK and US.

                • nekandro@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Just like how Israel “only targeted valid military targets,” right? Yeah…

                • iain@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You know that isn’t what I am saying.

                  It is what you’re implying. Even in this very comment: you just assume that violence is appropriate for protecting a trade route, but we have to be very nice to CEOs of companies that destroy the environment and use slave labor. Please examine your own biases and see the consequences.