• Eggyhead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    EU doing all the heavy regulatory lifting that American politicians are too afraid to touch. As both an American and an avid Apple enthusiast, I sincerely appreciate it.

    Apple will do something to ensure only batteries from them work right, mark my words.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple will do something to ensure only batteries from them work right, mark my words.

      They tried doing this with the upcoming USB C cables but EU stepped in by making sure that every cable will work without any limitations on transfer and charging speeds.

      I fully expect Apple claim that the EU is an environmental terrorist by having “disposable batteries being thrown out after their charge is depleted” and that somehow having batteries being certified by Apple prevents that.

    • kek_w_lol@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Certainly. But I hope the EU regulators do the same trick as they did with the USB C port rregulation. It is against the rules to make it a walled garden.

  • Griseowulfin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally don’t understand the purpose of this law. I’ve never discarded a phone due to battery issues (iPhone user). It’s usually just been a slow device, sometimes due to a failing charging port or 3.5mm Jack. I’d rather have the opportunity to replace ports, screens, and buttons.

    Do any of you guys experience issues needing a battery replacement that often?

  • RaoulDuke@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Non-replaceable batteries benefit no one but device manufacturers and miners of lithium, cobalt, etc.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it would really benefit or harm the lithium miners and battery manufacturers - in fact it might benefit them more if they could sell their batteries directly to consumers and skip the middleman, keeping those profits for themselves.

  • anarchism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    wonder how apple will react to this. lack of user repairability is a considerable source of revenue for them.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to do the same thing as the printer companies. and install authentication chips in the battery modules so that only official apple batteries could be installed in Apple devices - then sell their batteries at marked up prices

      “We made them easily available and replaceable, what more could you want?”

  • Hazrod@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes ! I loved that. My previous phone has a dead battery, and I can’t get it replaced because the manufacturer doesn’t make the battery anymore.

  • Thoralf Will@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do not like this, at all.

    I don’t want to replace my battery. I want my battery to last. 5 years, at least.

    This legislation will achieve the opposite and paves the way for batteries that are just crap and need replacement after 12 or 18 months. The companies have no motivation to make better batteries, protect them better against premature degradation.

    Sounds good, but generates a lot of trash.

    • kek_w_lol@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hell are you talking about? Every phone with a user replaceable battery that I have had is still alive and well today. And some of them are over 10 years old. Their batteries are obviously no longer in top shape, but they are still usable. And because they are user replaceable, if it dies, I will just put in a new one.

      Even if you are right. Just vote with your wallet. A battery that degenerates too quickly will just kill the sales of the phone it is in.

      Also cameras have replaceable batteries. Most live for longer than a modern phone.

      And lastly, for fun, let’s say your battery died too quickly because the manufacturer is a dipstick. Just buy a different brand of battery!

      Imagine how much easier repairs will be and how much lower the amount of e-waste will be when you can just replace your battery without any tools or knowledge of how to disassemble a smartphone.

      Repairability is always something to strive towards. Remember when laptop manufacturers said that a user repairable laptop would be too cumbersome and thick and look bad etc. Then Framework came along and made a wonderful laptop that is user repairable and has tons of cool features. And once you want to upgrade to a more modern CPU, you can upgrade the motherboard and upcycle the older one into a media center, a mini pc or whatever else people have already thought up.

      Also it will be fun to watch giant phone companies throw a fit about how this will stifle innovation (ahem Apple). Phones right now require tons of tools to open safely and successfully, because they are glued shut. The excuse they provide is that it is required for water resistance. And yet there were phones with a user replaceable battery and water resistance. And nowadays even phones without water resistance are glued shut.

      And the manufacturers call this innovation apparently. That is sad. And it is sad that you believe them.

        • Snowylynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why the proposal states that if the battery outlasts the lifespan of the product it does not need to be replaceable. Currently, and in the near-mid future, that just won’t be the case. Batteries are one of the components that fail the most in any smartphone. A user replaceable battery makes the difference between one part of e-waste and a whole device.

  • TheOtherJake@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They need to hit the final nail on the head. All smart phones sold in Europe must have fully documented and open source hardware including the entire chipset, all peripherals, and the modem, with all registers and interfaces documented, the full API, and all programing documentation along with a public toolchain that can reproduce the software as shipped with the device and updated with any changes made to future iterations as soon as the updated software is made available.

    This law would make these devices lifetime devices, if you choose; as in your lifetime. It would murder the disposable hardware culture, and it should happen now. Moore’s law is dead. The race is over.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least we can start with unlockable bootloader. Or at least, the second you’re discontinuing OS updates, you must give a bootloader unlocking tool + kernel sources. Including apple, shame that a device like an iPhone X is “e-waste” now that won’t receive updates