• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You make the same profit selling food to a starving person or a full person, but the starving person has a higher willingness to pay. The issue WOULDN’T be distribution if it wasn’t for wealth and income inequality.

    Wealth and income inequality can be fixed in Democratic Capitalism, you just vote for a tax that is distributed to the poorest people. We just haven’t done that to the degree necessary to solve this problem.

    If you think about it, for food, you would sell more if there was less inequality and you could sell to more people at the same price. So if there WAS some all powerful Food Capitalism Cartel they would be in favor of something like a wealth tax to fund a UBI.

    • coffeeaddict@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Literally all arguments against UBI are based down to “but, but- The workers will have a leverage!”

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not entirely true. The whole 3 missed meals from anarchy is kept up to keep the masses satiated.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Kind of weird that in the last 100 years nearly all the worst famines occured it communist countries.

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except that’s not true? China had much worse famines before the communist revolution, and both China and the USSR never had a famine after the ones you are thinking about.

      Meanwhile, we hear every 5 years that hundreds of thousands of people will die of hunger on the Horn of Africa, that millions of people are food insecure at the seat of capitalist power (the US, UK etc.). We see breadlines in the UK, families going hungry because of foodstamp cuts.

      And then you see Vietnam, China, Cuba… and they have eliminated famine. Not hunger, but famine. Meaning there are no food insecure people. The USSR had done the same before it collapsed. People in the USSR had better food security than people in the US after the 50s.

      You basically don’t know what you’re talking about and are just repeating propaganda points from the Cold War. It’s vibes based ideology, no facts or science.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        ROFL nothing what you said is remotely true lol

        Saying people in the ussr had better food security than people in the USA in the 50s hahahahahaha

        Tankies…lol