A bill to ban the use of the mineral in public water passed the Florida House 88-27. It now awaits Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signature.

Lawmakers in Florida gave final passage to a bill to ban fluoride in public water systems Tuesday, with the state House voting 88-27.

SB 700, also known as the Florida Farm Bill, doesn’t mention the word “fluoride,” but it would effectively ban the chemical compound by preventing “the use of certain additives in a water system.” The bill awaits Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signature.

If DeSantis, a Republican, signs the bill, Florida will become the second state to ban fluoride from water supplies.

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    How can the bill not say fluoride specifically but mentions “certain additives”. Surely it must list what those certain additives are? Odd.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      It basically says you can’t add anything to water except for “water quality additives” and has a fuzzy definitely of water quality additive.

      403.859 Prohibited acts.—The following acts and the causing thereof are prohibited and are violations of this act: (8) The use of any additive in a public water system whichdoes not meet the definition of a water quality additive as defined in s. 403.852(19)

      And then 403.852(19) has

      “Water quality additive” means any chemical, additive, or substance that is used in a public water system for the purpose of: (a) Meeting or surpassing primary or secondary drinking water standards; (b) Preventing, reducing, or removing contaminants; or © Improving water quality.

      Bold are the additions. The “primary and secondary drinking water standards” are legally defined terms where the EPA sets limits on maximum allowable amounts of stuff in water.

      https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/how-epa-regulates-drinking-water-contaminants-documents

      Personally, I would argue that fluoride is added to water for the purpose of “improving water quality” because water that protects people’s teeth is higher quality than water that doesn’t. If I were someone from a municipality whose job was ensuring water quality, I would read this as still allowing the addition of fluoride. If anyone doesn’t like that, let them try to prove in a court that fluoridated water is lower quality.

  • then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yanks love to stereotype Brits as having bad teeth when statically your teeth have more cavities and removals (our dentistry focuses on health over cosmetics). Hopefully shit like this can fully kill that off that stereotype.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The UK largely doesn’t fluoridate, so this is one of the (few) areas where the US actually does better than the UK. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_by_country

      The UK does generally have better tooth health in the grand scheme of things, but it’s actually pretty close, and the US is still really high on the list.

      https://www.yongeeglintondental.com/blog/healthy-primary-teeth/

      Without checking, I suspect the US’s slightly higher cavity rate is more down to sugar consumption than received dental care.

      • Underbroen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Did you read the rest of the Wikipedia article? How is better to add fluoride in the amounts the US does? It says in the Wikipedia article:

        Recent studies suggest that water fluoridation, particularly in industrialized countries, may be unnecessary because topical fluorides (such as in toothpaste) are widely used and cavity rates have become low. For this reason, some scientists consider fluoridation to be unethical due to the lack of informed consent. However, a recent study funded by NHS found no significant difference between individuals who receive fluoridated water and those who don’t in terms of missing teeth and reducing social inequities.

        Also, new research highlights that high levels of fluoride is problematic for pregnant women (it affect cognitive abilities of the unborn child).

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I found this good review article based on a study commissioned by the Canadian government.

          https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408444.2023.2295338

          It seems like potential IQ effects are still difficult to distinguish as a dose response, so they weren’t able to come up with a point of departure. It doesn’t help that in a lot of studies comparing “high” and “low” fluoridation effects on IQ, the “low” is still higher than the WHO recommended level of 1.5 mg/L, and the US recommended level of 0.75.

          I think the optimal level is likely going to vary by municipality based on the quality of dental care and the use of fluoridated toothpaste (that everyone overuses), and consumption of high fluoride beverages like tea. I guess my main takeaway is that people need to read their local water quality report, and do what they will with that information

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        and also dental care isnt usually covered by most insurance so people try to ignore the problem til its too late.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Vision insurance is also completely useless.

            “Whoops, your prescription is too strong. We only cover glasses for the mildly blind.”

            I stopped signing up for vision insurance when it was cheaper to do some “two for one frames” deal without insurance.

        • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 days ago

          The majority of people I know with dental issues couldn’t afford to have minor things fixed so they turned into major things.

          Dental insurance is a joke and lots of people don’t even get that joke.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            i had to wait 10years befor going to the dentist, because it was mostly unaffordable, one of my bros went to a dentist who dint take insurance but they charged hundreds per (whatever they were doing for the teeth), ultimately resulting in an abscess /root canal and then a very expensive implant.

            the dentist reasoning is because insurance dont fully reimburse for the cost of the procedures, plus its a hassle to deal with in general.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      what ive found out when i was looking for toothpaste is how many people are obsessed with whitening thier teeth, that alot of toothpaste have it. whitening toothpaste actually damages the teeth overtime, either via through peroxides, or high abrasive toothpastes. Also if your going sls and flouride free, they also tend to have alot of whitening products in them too. and these also cause ulcers and chelitis issues.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Dumb question: if this becomes countrywide, can we do it ourselves? Like, add fluoride and what have you to our tap water?

    • ProfessorPeregrine@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Some public water naturally has flouride in it without adding it. IIRC it was high flouride well water in Colorado that revealed its benefits You can also use flouride rinses or just not rinse after brushing. This doesn’t help kids though, which as I understand it are the primary beneficiaries of flouride in waterr.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      As far as I know there’s not a way to just add it to the house supply, like they do with water softeners in some places, but you can get drops you can add to an individual glass of water. There are also tablets you can take. What I do at this point is use a fluoride mouthwash in the evening (the purple listerine; you have to avoid eating or drinking for 30 minutes after using it, so the evening is convenient that way) and also get the fluoride treatment at my dental hygienist appointments, along with using a fluoride toothpaste (which you’re most likely already using).

      It’s a hassle, though, especially during the transition. When I moved out here, my teeth got worse in a hurry until I adapted to this new routine.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Well, now I know for sure that you’re not in that state.

      Because they got U out

      Also, the Spanish named it “Florida”, which means “flowered”, root word “flor” for “flower”. Likewise, Nevada means “covered in snow”, root word “nieve” for “snow”.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe that is not the etymology, and also you spelled flouride wrong.