• @dinckelman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1775 months ago

    So they’re not even arguing that they’re selling children’s data. They’re arguing against the block on such sales. Rotten to the core

    • Poggervania
      link
      fedilink
      655 months ago

      Unfortunately, the United Corporations of America loves milking kids for money because they hope and bank on kids annoying the shit out of their parents to spend money on whatever is being marketed towards them

      • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        305 months ago

        It’s why toys and sugary cereals run alongside cartoons. We should just ban advertising toward children.

          • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            215 months ago

            Seriously, I’d rather just ban overt advertisement. Labels on buildings and stylings? Sure, what ever, peacock your actual location all you want. Have tons of info and material available for people? Definitely. Have catalogs for people to look through where you layout your stuff and make it look nice? Sure. Search engines? Duh. But straight up ads? Nah. Such a waste of time. Let peoples’ interest drive the views again.

              • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                The most basic argument for ads that I’ve heard is that they can inform consumers of options they would not otherwise be aware of. Not unreasonable, competition can only exist if people are aware that alternatives exist.

                But that’s not how ads are used or the psychology and research put behind them. And the modern incarnation of capitalism as infintiely growing profits above literally all else puts too much skin in the game for companies to make “purely informative” ads. Ugh. Fuck ads.

        • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          The ones who never matured from the time they opened their FB account. So, the old who have only backslid, and the exceptionally stupid, who will always act like children.

        • @restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Unfortunately, old people who have no boundaries and believe it’s acceptable to post photos and details of themselves and others on their public account.

          If you have older parents or grandparents online, watch out. Even without an account of your own, Facebook knows you.

        • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          What other, better options exist for allowing friends and family you are not in daily contact with to keep up with the goings on in your life that you choose to share?

          Legitimately I’m wondering how most people are keeping in touch nowadays. What other systems have people moved on to? What manual processes are people using?

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -135 months ago

      Not to defend Meta, but monetizing doesn’t imply selling. Factories monetize their equipment, for example, but they don’t sell it if they want to stay in business.

      • @dinckelman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        My guy, what do you think an ad network uses people’s data for? This is not even a hypothetical situation. They will absolutely sell anything they can to some dogshit corporation, for targeted adverts

      • @restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Sure but they are still maintaining data and selling access to it insights from it or ads targeted based on it to third parties.

        It’s being used to target content to minors for the purpose of selling directly to them, influencing their choices without any kind of real oversight.

        Even if the data isn’t sold directly it’s still not okay.

        • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Sure. I’m just taking issue with the ridiculously common claim that advertising companies sell your data. It’s false and doesn’t even make sense.

          It also matters because I’d much rather a few big companies have my data than a bunch of Russian and Chinese data brokers. Even if you think they’re no worse individually, there are a lot more of them.