… of children.

Historically, that would be true, but this SCOTUS is wild. Standing doesn’t mean much anymore. Take, for example, the recent ruling from the anti-lgbt web developer in the 303 Creative v Elenis decision. Smith had not started a business at the time the original suit was filed, and, after she had begun operating, shr did not have any requests to make such a wedding site as described in the suit. During an appeal, she provided a false request – for a man already married to a woman – as her standing. Her standing was obviously bullshit; she had none.

Not that it really helps. Our current SCOTUS will certainly not agree to hear a case that could actually benefit us and defend our civil rights. We should probably start fresh with a new SCOTUS if we want any of that.

Yes, and you can tell how ineffectual it is with how much effort they are going through to stop it!

Conservatives. Shitting their pants to own the libs.

We have children who need help! Someone call in the “pro-life” conservatives! Don’t worry, gang, we know those God-loving righteous people will come through to solve this. Surely, they will be stumbling over each other help. Nobody talks a bigger game of saving the kids.

What are the bad faith laws in the US like?

I read that as laws that were written in bad faith. Of those, we are bountiful.

Same, bro. I wanted to know what they had to say, so I read a couple paragraphs of “I’m a liberal elite democrat, just like you” followed by “Trump did nothing wrong” and knew I had to stop. It is dishonest to look at the Mueller report and come to the conclusion that there was nothing worth investigating when Mueller explicitly said that he recommends charges against the then president – specifically several counts of obstruction by him and his administration that effectively stonewalled the investigation about collusion with Russia.

If that’s how they felt was the strongest opening argument, it reveals how weak that whole angle was. It certainly did reveal a bias, but not on the part of NPR, and it is certainly clear that this author deserves no more time or attention.

Take the L, m8.

I’m literate. They clearly meant “vessel.”

I’m less convinced of either of those statements now than I was before.

Hello friend. Vassal is actually not misspelled, and is a different word from vessel. In this context, the vassal of horror would be an emissary or owner of lands of horror.

Don’t let trolls bring you down. Some people just are not happy without making someone else sad.

Article credited to Jonah Goldberg. I get that it can be hard to separate yourself from your biases, but fabricating a reality where the actions of Israel are not textbook genocide is delusional.

While I personally do appreciate the level of detail and amount of options provided in this reply, the more straightforward and longer-term solution is to eat the rich.

could hurt pedestrians and cyclists

I dare you to convince me that anyone still buying Tesla would not see that as a benefit. That’s going to be the number one selling point of this thing after articles like this make their rounds.

At every inch this moves along, I’m reminded of that one time Keanu mentioned wanting to return to a character that didn’t get enough recognition the first time around https://youtube.com/shorts/3bz543X9QYQ?si=HAE_pub-T722gvYn

Why are they censoring the truth?

Oh, that must be really embarrassing, but…

graphic images and disinformation

Maybe work on your reading comprehension to make sure you don’t embarrass yourself like that again.

Republicans: plot to kidnap and murder governor

Your dumb ass: BoTh SiDeS aRe ThE sAmE