I might found a workaround IPFS + OpenTimestamps

Are the File Sharing and Voice and Video Calls are E2EE ?

Thanks all for your input !

So yes /sdcard was /storage/emulated/0 and it’s a real sd-card.

That was indeed formatted as FAT, I reformatted into EXT4 (from a desktop Linux) put the SD-card back into the phone and started the phone.

Ive tried (in the phone)

su
chmod 777 /storage/emulated/0 #yes it's still mounted as emulated !
stat /storage/emulated/0
#...
#Access: (0771)
#....

So I’m still blocked… any ideas ?

Thanks.

I’ve found the most simple way (for my case) adb shell 'a command'

example

adb shell ls /

Thank you all for your input… but it seem my question is still not fully answered…

let me rephrase, I’m not looking to have a GUI to transfer files, but I would like to execute terminal command remotely (from my computer) to my android phone. Like SSH .

So I’ve read that I can install a SSH server on my android phone… (If you know some’s (FLOSS), I’m all ears) Or if you know a better way than SSH I’m all ears too.

Thanks.

setfacl -m m:r aFile
#re set the mask

solve the problem, but the question is: why the F**** this is happening !?

Update, this is only happening when I copy files from a ~SMB share… :'(
Otherwise it’s correct…

Proxmox seem powerfull

It’s a Type1, not Type2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervisor#Classification

Thank you all !

Indeed setting execute perm on example, sub1, sub2, static

The program/user have now access to the directory.

In order words all the parents directory need at least execute in order to have access in the targeted directory…

Now I gave 751 for static. Meaning than others (here nginx) cannot list the files within. But never the less it works
the static files are appearing when requested (HTTP) but forbidding nginx to list the directory is changing something ? (performance/security)

Thanks

Something worth reading regarding Systemd https://www.devuan.org/os/announce/ Cheers.

I’ve gave a longer trial to gpg4win and it’s very power full and easy to use ! Of course it’s pointless to use such a nice tool on a none air-gaped Windows…

For the others there is Gnu-Linux :)

I’ve received a lot of reactions on the original post: https://programming.dev/post/10465121

But if someone is involved with the development of Thunderbird I think this is worth reading: https://programming.dev/comment/7677398

For my part I will use the OpenPGP sigin tools for now.

Cheers.

Thank you all for your quick reactions !!

To summarize if I want to use the PDF built-in signing I will need to convert my OpenPGP into a X.509 cert otherwise I can simply use the OpenPGP file signing

I want to stick to the UNIX Philosophy especially:

Write programs that do one thing and do it well.

So I will use the OpenPGP signing tool :)

Thanks !

Thanks all for your input.

My only workaround was to check programmatically all those input and set them with a setCustomValidity()

Too bad there isn’t a method to relaunch the validity across all the page :/

Cheers

Thank @daisyKutter@lemmy.ml

it’s look like that that code only verify the form when submitting… I need to check the validity when the element has been loaded.

btw checkValidity() do not solve this issue as it return True when the length is longer than maxlength ! O_o I guess this is were is lying the “bug”

Thank you @coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works that exactly my question… how can I trigger the validation process again ?

It will not be digest to send all what I use for you to see it (it will lead to TL;DR)

but here an elements (loaded with XHR that give the problem

<input id="something" name="something" type="text" placeholder="aPlaceholder"  minlength="3" maxlength="32" value="this value is more than the limiation of 32 char" autofocus required>

So normally this element should be invalid and a CSS selector of :invalid should match. but it’s not the case because the browser seem to not run the validation check on loaded elements… !?

if we edit manually the input , for example removing one character then the validation process kick-in and the CSS selector work etc…

Hey @hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org

Thanks for your output, but RSA seem to not be recommended anymore, dig on a search engine…

@crystal@feddit.de I didn’t know about GrapheneOS too bad it only work Pixel phones (that are also owned by Google ! ) So If I’m against Google for all what they do https://degooglisons-internet.org/en/ I’ll certainly not give them money !

(Finding and importing a phone is something you have to do even when using the stock OS.)

True, but you will do it multiple time if the phone that your looking for doesn’t have an available ROM somewhere…

Indeed, but in AOSP there is no GMS and that already better !