What about CEOs that poison entire communities for personal gain?

Congratulations, you just earned yourself 600,000 dollars from Nvidia.

Yeah “Something something thread safety” isn’t a super well fleshed out point compared to the others. Not to demand extra work from OP, but all the other logic is just much easier to follow.

Could it have been the stats for the Steam Next Fest? I think those were higher than 50%, and I’m sure there is some bias in the likelihood of making a demo to show off when you can just “chatbbt, promotionalized I viriticl splice for demo day”

Vitamin C is good at combating scurvy

By that logic we should be snorting lines of Ascorbic acid

No actually, not really.

I don’t think even the rotating villains of capital want Hegseth involved in the military (and its not like he would be removed if this had passed). This seems more an issue of broader failures of democrats even when aligned.

The arguments that are in favor of social democracies are those around the effectiveness of social welfare programs and how effective compassion is as a political root, but that doesn’t make them fractionally socialist and they aren’t held up as socialist countries. I feel like a lot of this follows from a view of “socialism is when the government does stuff”, which I doubt was the definition Calfpupa was using.

What voting trends have you seen that suggest a move towards democratization of the economy over privatization that would be in line with complete democratic control? Further what trends have you seen in freeing neo-colonies from debt trappings and foreign ownership?

I can see why you don’t struggle with the network effect.

Why do you think this meme is applicable here? Calfpupa never said socialism never works, she said you can’t vote your way to it. If your point is that you’re happy with the neo-colonialism of northern Europe, yeah we know the liberal position.

This implies the existence of a theoretical low import beginning election that predates all known elections. A singular Big Vote, if you will.

This is full conspiracy from me, but could the terms of service for github grant the right to “enhance tools” based on private github projects. These then get moved around as ‘anonymized’ data to train off?

These are the ipad children we’ve left behind 😔

Google’s revenue from search rose 12 percent year-over-year to $63.25 billion, a little lower than the 14.5 percent growth the company reported in last year’s Q3.

It’s wild that it took a 2.5% search revenue miss to make them wonder if maybe this is actually dumb as shit. 🤔

They do, but they can’t put 10 ads in one query like they can with search.

I don’t think that’s fair unless by “we” you mean the oil companies and their bought politicians.

He also said self driving cars where “here” in 2014. Not sure he’s that prophetic.

I don’t know that you’re following what I dislike about it.

I don’t think it’s bad to insult AI or its fanatics online. For me it’s a distrust of anyone that delights in cosplay racism in whatever form is acceptable, and while they are doing so strive to be close to recreating real racism. I am thinking of people with chatgpt girlfriends being mocked as clanker lovers; it just seems like we can insult loser gooners without drawing on slurs.

It’s just never tasted right to me that we happened to land on a robo slur with a hard r.

Except it doesn’t do that. Lets shuffle the teams and see if you can see how dumb this comes across.

Imagine Abdul El-Sayed having an interview with fox news, and after months of painting him as wanting Sharia law, close friends with people that hate America, and the daughter of a woman involved with the Muslim Brotherhood. In that interview they talk about someone that made a political assassination attempt on El-Sayed, stating their hate for all of the above. When asked about the manifesto of the shooter, El-Sayed says they were mentally ill and it’s terrible what the lies they’ve been convinced to believe about him. If the fox news interviewer then smugly says, “Oh do you think it’s referring to you?” does that not come across as the absolute dumbest smarmy gotcha? Wouldn’t that make you feel more like the media is being deceptive and moving in bad faith when talking about El-Sayed?

I am fully aware of the difference in these cases, and that Trump actually is a pedophile and rapist, but this smug clap back does nothing but galvanize those that already think the media is “out to get Trump”. And if we want to actually try and convince whoever in the Trump cult is teetering on realizing they’ve been lied to, its with the detailed receipts of how close Epstein and Trump were. Not pithy witticisms that amount to “pedo says what?”.