NightFantom

Nah, it was always the appearance of knowledge, it’s just never been this easy to produce it in these quantities

I’ve had very good veggie burgers, that were basically tons of vegetables tied together with eggs

I think it strongly detracts from the post. I basically skipped right to the comments without clicking the link because I’m assuming it’s AI slop, and I’m hoping the comments are interesting.

-1 child per year is an impressive number to keep up, especially from prison. On the flip side, the number of cars you drive or transatlantic flights you take from prison might also be very low.

Last time a colleague asked chatgpt to format a document, a few ids got removed and new ones got hallucinated in. Still laugh whenever I remember, thanks for that 🤣

And illegal under GDPR I’m pretty sure

Which is a colour named after the fruit iirc

Many games with voices also support subtitles, personally I learned most of my English from my parents watching English tv with subs (in our language at first, then when I was a little older English subs)

I think you’re on to something, horsey jumps so it is safe on the concrete block, then jumps to the next concrete block whatever black does, then gives checkmate unless it moved the king’s pawn, in which case tough luck

Was it fighting random germans, or fighting the actual nazis? I’m not sure what you’re trying to say.

Very clear! Especially the nudge towards waves instead of “classical” particles was exactly what made it click, thanks!

Not a physicist, but question: how does the passing through each other relate to particles in the standard model? Is that something that’s been observed? If not, is that something that could feasibly be tested (soon)?

Oh yeah fully agree, just curious

What do they censor for instance? I don’t recall seeing nudity, swear words or over the top violence in previous seasons?

After another read, prompted by this comment, I found the part they’re referring to: if you click through at the top of the pdf to HLG you get here: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/high-level-group-hlg-access-data-effective-law-enforcement_en, and this does describe all the things mentioned in that comment!

Note that OP’s link is less crazy and dangerous (in fact, in cyber security you basically assume the metadata is known anyway), but this implies coming proposals that are a lot more invasive to our privacy

Hmm, fair point. I guess I default to assuming that data is already kept, just often not long enough for law enforcement to come and request it (in a way that’s functionally the same as never even saving it I guess), but practically this would mean lots of providers starting to keep records, also the storage requirement would be enormous if it’s saved at every hop, so practicality is a concern too.

Correct me if I’m wrong:

The way I read it it’s not about any new data gathering or backdoors or whatever, it’s about keeping the metadata (so not message content, but things like source/destination, date & time of a message), which already are known to the service provider, but not structurally saved until slow law enforcement comes asking for it (which they already can and do). So nothing is added except efficiency, if I read it correctly.

If you have concerns about anything they already do, or things not in this proposal but scary or dangerous; now is as good a time as any to complain about it, and perhaps this is a valid platform for it, but phrase it as such.

But some of the comments (on the proposal) talking about adding backdoors just look like someone didn’t read and just blindly started complaining, which is not a good look.

If we want to participate as educated citizens, let’s educate ourselves so our input is still valued in the future.

That all aside, thanks for sharing!

Especially if you use “bread” loosely

Fun game, thanks for sharing!

It’s not that hard to see lol