flamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down116
arrow-up1302arrow-down1imageMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squaredriving_croonerlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.